Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ProV International PHProV International PH
VS
HitachiHitachi
ProV International PH

ProV International PH

H.V. Dela Costa , Makati, 1209, PH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.provintl.com
749/1000Moderate

ProV is an award winning global technology consulting firm. Specializing in IT strategy, advisory, implementation, management and optimization. Our proven technology solutions not only improve operations, but provide better business outcomes and results. We specialize ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hitachi

Hitachi

1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100-8280

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hitachi.com
827/1000Good

For over 100 years, Hitachi has been committed to developing innovations that improve lives. Today, this means creating superior technology and products that balance environment, well-being, and economic growth. We integrate IT, operational technology (OT), and produc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:37,613
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ProV International PH

ProV International PH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi

Hitachi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProV International PH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ProV International PH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProV International PH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ProV International PH

ProV International PH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hitachi

Hitachi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497

FAQ

Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ProV International PH company and Hitachi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ProV International PH and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ProV International PH and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ProV International PH or Hitachi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ProV International PH or Hitachi ?
Between ProV International PH and Hitachi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ProV International PH and Hitachi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA