Comparison Overview

Protocall Services, Inc.

VS

Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC

Protocall Services, Inc.

621 SW Alder, Portland, 97205, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

ProtoCall Services, Inc. is the nation’s leading third-party provider of specialty clinical call-center services and digital tools to the behavioral health field. Formally established in 1992, ProtoCall’s customers include community behavioral health providers, employee assistance programs, university counseling centers, and managed behavioral health organizations. ProtoCall answers calls on behalf of more than 350 organizations who all look to ProtoCall’s call center services and digital tools to provide a level of access and coverage that they typically could not otherwise afford. ProtoCall employs over 200 of the best and the brightest including at least 85 Masters and Doctorate Level clinicians. ProtoCall regularly receives accolades for our outstanding organizational culture. Most recently receiving the "Top Workplace 2022" award for the state of Oregon.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 402
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC

3541 Chain Bridge Rd., Fairfax, Virginia, 22030, US
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799

Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center (VTCC) is a private mental healthcare services organization that has been in operation for over 21 years We support children, youth, and families located in the Northern Virginia and Fredericksburg Virginia and surrounding Cities and Counties that are provided through private insurance, Medicaid as well as County funded (FAPT). Our programs currently include Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) or EPSDT and In Clinic, and Home-Based Intensive In-Home Services (HB-IIH). It is the mission of VTCC to provide effective home based services and treatment to local families from a range of diverse backgrounds, whose children are experiencing significant behavioral or emotional difficulties, or have been subjected to abuse or neglect and are at high risk of being removed from the family home. For more information regarding the types of insurance we accept, and other questions, please visit our website or call main office line 703-218-6599.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protocall-services-inc..jpeg
Protocall Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-transcultural-clinical-center.jpeg
Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Protocall Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Protocall Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC in 2026.

Incident History — Protocall Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Protocall Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protocall-services-inc..jpeg
Protocall Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-transcultural-clinical-center.jpeg
Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Protocall Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Protocall Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company and Protocall Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company nor Protocall Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company nor Protocall Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company nor Protocall Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. company nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. company nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Protocall Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Protocall Services, Inc. nor Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N