Comparison Overview
Protection 1 Security Solutions
Protection 1 Security Solutions
1267 Windham Parkway, Romeoville, IL, 60446, US
Last Update: 18/12/2025
As of May 2016, Protection 1 and ADT merged together to become the leading company in the electronic security industry. As we progress through our integration, you will see collateral, building signs and apparel from both companies, but please know: we are on our way to...
GardaWorld
2300 Émile-Bélanger, Saint-Laurent , H4R 3J4, CA
Last Update: 21/09/2026
GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Protection 1 Security Solutions
GardaWorld
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Protection 1 Security Solutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GardaWorld in 2026.
Incident History - Protection 1 Security Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Protection 1 Security Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GardaWorld (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GardaWorld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Protection 1 Security Solutions
GardaWorld
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.