Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Protection 1 Security SolutionsProtection 1 Security Solutions
VS
G4SG4S
Protection 1 Security Solutions

Protection 1 Security Solutions

1267 Windham Parkway, Romeoville, IL, 60446, US

Last Update: 18/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.protection1.com
764/1000Fair

As of May 2016, Protection 1 and ADT merged together to become the leading company in the electronic security industry. As we progress through our integration, you will see collateral, building signs and apparel from both companies, but please know: we are on our way to...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:1,445
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
G4S

G4S

6th Floor, London, SW1H 0DB, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.g4s.com
823/1000Good

G4S is a leading security and facility services company that provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver tailored, integrated security solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Through a global workforce of appro...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:114,593
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Protection 1 Security Solutions

Protection 1 Security Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
G4S

G4S

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Protection 1 Security Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G4S in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Protection 1 Security Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Protection 1 Security Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - G4S (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G4S cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Protection 1 Security Solutions

Protection 1 Security Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
G4S

G4S

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions company and G4S company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions and G4S, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions and G4S, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Protection 1 Security Solutions or G4S ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Protection 1 Security Solutions or G4S ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions and G4S, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Protection 1 Security Solutions and G4S, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA