Comparison Overview

Prosus

VS

Arrow Electronics

Prosus

Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geographies – Europe, Latin America and India. In these geographies, Prosus simplifies the often-fragmented experience for consumer buyers and sellers, providing an integrated and frictionless approach that helps billions of consumers to buy, sell and transact through food, Fintech, experiences and commerce platforms

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,250
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arrow Electronics

9201 East Dry Creek Road, Centennial, Colorado, US, 80112
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spans the entire technology landscape, helps customers design, distribute and deploy forward-thinking products that make the benefits of technology accessible to as many people as possible. Learn more at arrow.com. Are you thinking Five Years Out? Join us at careers.arrow.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,812
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosus.jpeg
Prosus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prosus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arrow Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow Electronics in 2025.

Incident History — Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arrow Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosus.jpeg
Prosus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Prosus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arrow Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Arrow Electronics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prosus company has not reported any.

In the current year, Arrow Electronics company and Prosus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor Prosus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Arrow Electronics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prosus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor Prosus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prosus company nor Arrow Electronics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arrow Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prosus company.

Arrow Electronics company employs more people globally than Prosus company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prosus nor Arrow Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L