Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Proofpoint

Proofpoint Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

proofpoint.com

We secure how people, data and AI agents connect across email, cloud and collaboration tools.


Proofpoint A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Proofpoint
Company Information
Website:https://www.proofpoint.com
Employees number:4,976
Number of followers:182,427
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:proofpoint.com
Proofpoint Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
ProofpointComputer and Network Security
Updated:
08/06/2026
690/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Proofpoint Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
ProofpointComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Proofpoint
ProofpointWeak
Current Score
690B (WEAK)
01000
3 incidents
-31 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
690Before Incident
MAY 2026
707Before Incident
APRIL 2026
704Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Apr 2026Proofpoint
GitLab, Proofpoint, Google, GitHub, Phantom and Firefox: North Korean Hackers Use Fake Coding Tasks to Steal Crypto

North Korean Threat Actor Targets Developers in Large-Scale Phishing Campaign

685After Incident
LOW-19
MOZPHAGITPROGOOGIT1780935989
North Korean Threat Actor Targets Developers in Large-Scale Phishing Campaign A likely North Korean threat actor has conducted a sophisticated phishing campaign, targeting nearly 100 organizations primarily in the U.S. with fake job offers and code-review requests to steal cryptocurrency and credentials. The operation, tracked by Proofpoint as UNK_DeadDrop, sent over 250 malicious emails in April and May 2026, focusing on employees in technology, education, finance, and cryptocurrency firms. ### How the Attack Worked The campaign used shifting pretexts including fake full-stack developer roles, AI payment agent projects, and ERC-4626 smart-contract testing to lure victims into cloning malicious GitHub or GitLab repositories. Once opened in VS Code or Cursor, a hidden tasks.json file executed automatically, exploiting a legitimate editor feature. - VS Code displayed a trust prompt, but Cursor ran the payload silently without user interaction. - The malware installed a fake Google-themed VS Code extension, ensuring persistence by relaunching on macOS and Linux whenever the editor reopened. - Linux/macOS systems received a Go-based remote access trojan (RAT) from the open-source Overlord framework, while Windows ran JavaScript directly in the editor, leaving no disk footprint. ### Data Theft & Wallet Drainage The malware targeted cryptocurrency wallets and browser credentials, including: - Browser extensions: MetaMask, Phantom, Keplr - Desktop wallets: Exodus, Electrum, Ledger Live - Saved passwords & cookies from Chrome, Brave, Edge, and Firefox To bypass security: - macOS/Linux displayed a fake password prompt, using the input to escalate privileges and dump keychains. - Windows bypassed Chrome’s app-bound encryption to extract data. After exfiltration, the malware deleted itself to evade detection. ### Attribution & Distinct Tactics While resembling Contagious Interview a long-running North Korean operation Proofpoint tracks UNK_DeadDrop separately due to its email-led delivery, large-scale repository creation, and self-contained payloads that persist even after infrastructure takedowns. Though attribution remains unconfirmed, the campaign aligns with North Korea’s history of targeting developers since 2022.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing, Malware, Credential Theft, Cryptocurrency Theft
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (cryptocurrency theft), credential theft
IMPACT
Financial Loss: Cryptocurrency wallet drainageData Compromised: Browser credentials, cryptocurrency wallet data, saved passwords, cookiesSystems Affected: macOS, Linux, Windows systems running VS Code or CursorIdentity Theft Risk: High (PII and credentials stolen)Payment Information Risk: High (cryptocurrency wallets targeted)
DATA BREACH
Browser credentialsCryptocurrency wallet dataSaved passwordsCookiesSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, financial data)Personally Identifiable Information: Browser credentials, saved passwords
MARCH 2026
704Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
703Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
701Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
700Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
698Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
755Before Incident
Breach
21 Oct 2025Proofpoint
Salesloft

Salesloft-Drift OAuth Token Breach

696After Incident
CRITICAL-59
DRI1593115102125
The Salesloft-Drift OAuth incident involved attackers stealing OAuth tokens from Salesloft’s development platform, exploiting them to access customer data across integrated applications like Salesforce and Google Workspace. The breach, executed by the threat group UNC6395, leveraged voice phishing (vishing) to trick administrators into authorizing malicious apps, bypassing multi-factor authentication (MFA). Over 700 organizations were impacted as the compromised tokens enabled attackers to exfiltrate sensitive customer information, leading to widespread revocation of Drift integrations. The incident exposed systemic risks in SaaS supply chains, where trusted third-party integrations became attack vectors, enabling potential data theft, cloud credential abuse, outages, or ransomware. Beyond immediate data exposure, the breach triggered forensic investigations, regulatory fines, lawsuits, reputational damage, and operational disruptions, highlighting the cascading risks of N-th degree vendor dependencies in modern cybersecurity ecosystems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachCredential TheftSupply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
Data ExfiltrationCredential HarvestingPotential Financial Gain (e.g., Dark Web Data Sales)
IMPACT
Customer DataCloud Credentials (AWS, Snowflake)Salesforce/Google Workspace DataSalesforceGoogle WorkspaceDrift IntegrationsConnected SaaS PlatformsTemporary Disabling of Drift IntegrationsCredential RevocationsForensic InvestigationsLoss of Trust in SaaS IntegrationsReputational Harm for Salesloft/DriftPotential LawsuitsRegulatory ScrutinyHigh (Stolen Cloud Credentials)PII Exposure via Connected Apps
DATA BREACH
Customer DataCloud Credentials (AWS, Snowflake)PII (via Connected Apps)Sensitivity Of Data: High (Credentials, PII, Business Data)
SEPTEMBER 2025
755Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
769Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Aug 2025Proofpoint
Unidentified Trucking Carriers, Proofpoint and Unidentified Freight Brokers: Cybercriminals Hit Freight and Trucking Companies In Cargo Theft Scheme

Cybercriminals Hijack Freight Shipments in Sophisticated Supply Chain Attacks

754After Incident
CRITICAL-15
PRONOVVTS1776407277
Cybercriminals Hijack Freight Shipments in Sophisticated Supply Chain Attacks A financially motivated cybercrime group is targeting the surface transportation industry, using advanced tactics to steal physical cargo by compromising freight brokers and trucking carriers. Since August 2025, cybersecurity firm Proofpoint has tracked nearly two dozen campaigns involving thousands of malicious messages, resulting in the theft of high-value shipments including electronics and energy drinks which are later resold online or shipped overseas. The attackers exploit digital load boards, marketplaces where brokers and carriers arrange freight shipments, through three primary methods: - Compromised Load Boards: Using stolen credentials, they post fraudulent freight listings and send malicious links to responding carriers. - Email Thread Hijacking: They infiltrate legitimate email chains between supply chain partners, inserting malicious URLs into trusted conversations. - Direct Email Targeting: Broad phishing campaigns target logistics firms to identify and later steal high-value cargo. Once a victim clicks a malicious link, it downloads an executable or MSI file that installs legitimate but abused Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) tools such as ScreenConnect, PDQ Connect, or LogMeIn Resolve enabling attackers to maintain control over compromised systems. While the threat actors remain unidentified, they demonstrate deep knowledge of trucking industry software and dispatch operations. To mitigate risks, Proofpoint recommends restricting unauthorized RMM tool installations, deploying network monitoring for suspicious activity, blocking executable email attachments, and training staff to recognize phishing attempts. As digital infrastructure becomes increasingly integral to supply chains, these attacks highlight the growing intersection of cyber threats and physical cargo theft, posing significant financial and operational risks to transportation companies.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain Attack, Cargo Theft
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Freight brokers, trucking carriers, logistics firmsOperational Impact: Theft of high-value shipments, disruption of freight operations
JULY 2025
769Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Proofpoint ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Proofpoint's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Proofpoint ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Proofpoint's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?