Comparison Overview
Pronto Project Management Software

Pronto Project Management Software
Level 2/4-12 Amsterdam Street, Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 04/03/2026
The way we work has changed. The world is moving faster. Teams are more distributed. Expectations are higher. AI is shifting how we plan, prioritise and deliver. But too often, information is scattered, visibility is limited, and decision-making lags behind. What’s mis...

SAP
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE
Last Update: 23/09/2026
SAP is a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI. We help organizations run mission-critical operations across finance, procurement, supply chain, human resources, and customer experience -and move from systems that record work to systems that can help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Pronto Project Management Software







SAP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pronto Project Management Software in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
SAP has 488.24% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Pronto Project Management Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pronto Project Management Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Pronto Project Management Software

SAP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.
Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.
The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.