Comparison Overview
Pronto Project Management Software
Pronto Project Management Software
Level 2/4-12 Amsterdam Street, Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 04/03/2026
The way we work has changed. The world is moving faster. Teams are more distributed. Expectations are higher. AI is shifting how we plan, prioritise and deliver. But too often, information is scattered, visibility is limited, and decision-making lags behind. What’s mis...
Atlassian
Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, AU, 2000
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Pronto Project Management Software
Atlassian
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pronto Project Management Software in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Atlassian has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Pronto Project Management Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pronto Project Management Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Pronto Project Management Software
Atlassian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.