Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project SylvaProject Sylva
VS
ShopifyShopify
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

N/A

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sylvaproject.org/
753/1000Fair

Sylva is an open-source project under Linux Foundation Europe, aimed at simplifying and accelerating the cloudification of telecom networks across Europe. We provide a cloud software framework tailored for telco and edge use cases like 5G, O-RAN, and edge computing, add...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shopify

Shopify

Ottawa, CA

Last Update: 15/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.shopify.com
777/1000Fair

Shopify is a leading global commerce company, providing trusted tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business of any size. Shopify makes commerce better for everyone with a platform and services that are engineered for reliability, while delivering a better...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:27,012
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shopify

Shopify

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Sylva in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Shopify has 273.83% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Sylva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Sylva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shopify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shopify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shopify

Shopify

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOSHO1781533703
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SEISHO1776716769
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SHO1774045594

FAQ

Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Sylva company and Shopify company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Sylva and Shopify, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Sylva and Shopify, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Sylva or Shopify ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Sylva or Shopify ?
Between Project Sylva and Shopify, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Sylva and Shopify, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8