Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project SylvaProject Sylva
VS
GrabGrab
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

N/A

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sylvaproject.org/
753/1000Fair

Sylva is an open-source project under Linux Foundation Europe, aimed at simplifying and accelerating the cloudification of telecom networks across Europe. We provide a cloud software framework tailored for telco and edge use cases like 5G, O-RAN, and edge computing, add...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grab

Grab

3 Media Close, Grab HQ #01-03/06 , Singapore, Singapore, SG, 138498

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://grab.careers
805/1000Good

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creati...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:53,590
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grab

Grab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Sylva in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Sylva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Sylva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grab

Grab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Sylva company and Grab company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Sylva and Grab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Sylva and Grab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Sylva or Grab ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Sylva or Grab ?
Between Project Sylva and Grab, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Sylva and Grab, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56414
SUMMARY

A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras certificate-related upload interfaces allow authenticated users to store arbitrary file content to fixed, persistent filesystem locations without validating file type, structure, or size. This design omission enables the placement of unexpected or malformed data in locations intended for trusted certificate material, which could affect system integrity or behavior even after reboot.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55975
SUMMARY

A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras that could allow an authenticated user to supply unsanitized XML fields to the device's certificate generation interface, which are incorporated into a backend certificate creation command without proper input validation. This may allow for command execution with elevated privileges during certificate generation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-33560
SUMMARY

The DMP-5000 file service exposes authenticated arbitrary file upload functionality. There are exposed endpoints which allows authenticated users to upload files of any type without validation. No file extension filtering or content inspection is enforced which allows executable binaries and scripts to be accepted and written directly to the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-31928
SUMMARY

The DMP-5000 devices are shipped with a default administrative web account with weak authentication controls, which are not required to be changed during initial configuration or operation. Using these accounts provides full system access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-28701
SUMMARY

Various versions of Daktronics Controller Firmware could allow authenticated and unauthenticated remote users to escape the intended directory and enumerate arbitrary file system paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9