Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project SylvaProject Sylva
VS
CiscoCisco
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

N/A

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sylvaproject.org/
753/1000Fair

Sylva is an open-source project under Linux Foundation Europe, aimed at simplifying and accelerating the cloudification of telecom networks across Europe. We provide a cloud software framework tailored for telco and edge use cases like 5G, O-RAN, and edge computing, add...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 24/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
161/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
32
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Sylva in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 2976.92% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Sylva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Sylva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Sylva

Project Sylva

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1787228649
🔒 Incident : Breach
CISRESMICAMASERSALGIT1786868753
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CISUNK1786551853

FAQ

Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Sylva company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Sylva and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Sylva and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Sylva or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Sylva or Cisco ?
Between Project Sylva and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Sylva and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA