Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project HospitalityProject Hospitality
VS
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaBoys & Girls Clubs of America
Project Hospitality

Project Hospitality

100 Park Ave, Staten Island, 10302, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Project Hospitality, a private not-for-profit organization based in Staten Island, New York, provides comprehensive services for hungry and homeless and inadequately housed people. As the only comprehensive homeless service provider in the borough of Staten Island, Proj...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:309
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

1275 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, Georgia, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bgca.org
783/1000Fair

Boys & Girls Clubs of America does whatever it takes for America’s youth to have great futures. As the nation's premier (nonprofit) youth development organization, our programs, training and services support millions of kids and teens every year. We hire employees who ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,959
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Hospitality

Project Hospitality

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Hospitality in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boys & Girls Clubs of America in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Hospitality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Hospitality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Boys & Girls Clubs of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boys & Girls Clubs of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Hospitality

Project Hospitality

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO146082125
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Hospitality company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Hospitality and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Hospitality and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Hospitality or Boys & Girls Clubs of America ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Hospitality or Boys & Girls Clubs of America ?
Between Project Hospitality and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Hospitality and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA