Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project Delivery PartnersProject Delivery Partners
VS
Technip EnergiesTechnip Energies
Project Delivery Partners

Project Delivery Partners

Global, OO

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.projectdeliverypartners.com
751/1000Fair

Project Delivery Partners is a specialized project delivery consulting company encompassing strong project management and technical expertise; providing specialist services to the Biopharmaceutical/Pharmaceutical sector, focusing on CQV, Project Management & Controls an...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:130
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Technip Energies

Technip Energies

Paris, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ten.com
775/1000Fair

Technip Energies is a global technology and engineering powerhouse. With leadership positions in LNG, hydrogen, ethylene, sustainable chemistry, and CO2 management, we are contributing to the development of critical markets such as energy, energy derivatives, decarbon...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:17,893
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Delivery Partners

Project Delivery Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Technip Energies

Technip Energies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Delivery Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technip Energies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Delivery Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Delivery Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Technip Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technip Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Delivery Partners

Project Delivery Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Technip Energies

Technip Energies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Delivery Partners company and Technip Energies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Delivery Partners and Technip Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Delivery Partners and Technip Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Delivery Partners or Technip Energies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Delivery Partners or Technip Energies ?
Between Project Delivery Partners and Technip Energies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Delivery Partners and Technip Energies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES