Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Progress OpenEdgeProgress OpenEdge
VS
VMwareVMware
Progress OpenEdge

Progress OpenEdge

15 Wayside Rd, Burlington, 01803, US

Last Update: 25/11/2025

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Progress OpenEdge is an application dev platform that thousands of businesses bet their businesses on. Across any platform, any mobile device, any cloud --  it just works. Supercharge enterprise development with OpenEdge.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VMware

VMware

3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, 94304, US

Last Update: 24/06/2026

View Profile
202/1000Critical

Broadcom's VMware software manages cloud complexity so customers can modernize infrastructure, accelerate app development, and protect workloads, wherever these reside. Our flagship cloud solutions provide the security and performance of private cloud combined with the...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,343
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Progress OpenEdge

Progress OpenEdge

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VMware

VMware

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress OpenEdge in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

VMware has 654.72% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Progress OpenEdge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress OpenEdge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VMware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VMware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Progress OpenEdge

Progress OpenEdge

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VMware

VMware

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VERVMWGOOMIC1781677737
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VMW1778840944
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VMWMICPAPIVA1775500095

FAQ

Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Progress OpenEdge company and VMware company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Progress OpenEdge and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Progress OpenEdge and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Progress OpenEdge or VMware ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Progress OpenEdge or VMware ?
Between Progress OpenEdge and VMware, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Progress OpenEdge and VMware, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA