Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Progressive Pipe FabricatorsProgressive Pipe Fabricators
VS
Burns & McDonnellBurns & McDonnell
Progressive Pipe Fabricators

Progressive Pipe Fabricators

5220 N 51st Ave, Glendale, Arizona, 85301, US

Last Update: 16/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://progressivepf.com/
753/1000Fair

Progressive Pipe Fabricators is a fire protection fabrication and specialty welding operation with locations in Alabama and Arizona. We offer custom solutions for virtually every type of sprinkler system, including fabrication for pipefittings, valves, heads, and a rang...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burnsmcd.com
784/1000Fair

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:16,522
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Progressive Pipe Fabricators

Progressive Pipe Fabricators

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progressive Pipe Fabricators in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Progressive Pipe Fabricators (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Pipe Fabricators cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Progressive Pipe Fabricators

Progressive Pipe Fabricators

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Progressive Pipe Fabricators or Burns & McDonnell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Progressive Pipe Fabricators or Burns & McDonnell ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Progressive Pipe Fabricators and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9