Comparison Overview

Progressive Insurance

VS

AXA

Progressive Insurance

6300 Wilson Mills Road, Mayfield Village, OH, US, 44143
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees are encouraged to risk, learn, and grow. With our supportive culture, work-life balance, and one of the largest contemporary art collections in the country, there’s a reason we’ve been named one of the best places to work. For over 80 years, Progressive has offered customers a wide range of insurance choices, including auto, home, renters, commercial auto, small business, motorcycle, boat policies, and more. Progressive is the second largest auto insurer in the country—a combined effort of every single person at Progressive. We’re a dynamic group of more than 65,000 talented employees—from all walks of life, all fields of business, and all 50 states. Everyone here plays a role in our success as we continue to help our customers move forward and live fully. With hundreds of career paths including Claims, Customer Care, Sales, Marketing, Legal, IT, Data Analysis, and more, you are sure to find the destination for your career at Progressive.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 43,679
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

AXA

25, avenue Matignon, Paris, FR, FR, 75008
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

As one of the largest global insurers, our purpose is to act for human progress by protecting what matters. Protection has always been at the core of our business, helping individuals, businesses and societies to thrive. And AXA has always been a leader, an innovator, an entrepreneurial company, fostering progress in all its dimensions. Our purpose also links back to the Group's roots. From the outset, AXA has been committed to acting as a force for collective good. From solidarity-based actions with AXA Hearts In Action to work on prevention issues with the AXA Research Fund and the fight against climate change, AXA has always been attentive to its social environment and embraced its responsibility as an insurer: responsibility for taking action upstream in order to better understand risks, with one goal in mind: to ensure better protection. Discover more: https://www.axa.com/en/about-us/our-purpose To know more about AXA's Privacy Policy - https://www-axa-com.cdn.axa-contento-118412.eu/www-axa-com/1cd44dfb-3b7a-4cf7-933b-06024cf7f25b_axa_privacypolicy_internetusers_va.pdf

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 139,913
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progressive-insurance.jpeg
Progressive Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axa.jpeg
AXA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progressive Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AXA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Progressive Insurance has 49.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA in 2025.

Incident History — Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AXA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progressive-insurance.jpeg
Progressive Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: exploitation of quote tool vulnerabilities, unauthorized access
Motivation: financial gain, fraud (unemployment claims)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Fraudulent Employment via Identity Theft)
Motivation: Unauthorized access to sensitive data (potential financial gain or fraud)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axa.jpeg
AXA
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AXA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Progressive Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Progressive Insurance company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to AXA company.

In the current year, Progressive Insurance company has reported more cyber incidents than AXA company.

AXA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Progressive Insurance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Progressive Insurance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AXA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AXA company nor Progressive Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Progressive Insurance company nor AXA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AXA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Progressive Insurance company.

AXA company employs more people globally than Progressive Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progressive Insurance nor AXA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H