Comparison Overview
Progressive Independent Agents

Progressive Independent Agents
N/A
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Independent agents have been integral to our success since our founding in 1937, and investing in the channel is a long-term, strategic priority for Progressive. We’re proud to serve more than 40,000 independent agents as we work to become their #1 choice and destinatio...

Intact
700 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 0A1, CA
Last Update: 06/09/2026
We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Progressive Independent Agents







Intact






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Progressive Independent Agents has 36.71% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Intact in 2026.
Incident History - Progressive Independent Agents (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Progressive Independent Agents cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Progressive Independent Agents

Intact
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.