Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Programme 2030 CanadaProgramme 2030 Canada
VS
Ville de MontréalVille de Montréal
Programme 2030 Canada

Programme 2030 Canada

N/A

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile

En septembre 2015, le Canada et les 192 autres États membres des Nations Unies ont adopté le Programme de développement durable à l'horizon 2030 lors de l'Assemblée générale des Nations Unies. Cette initiative est un appel mondial à l'action pour mettre fin à la pauvret...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

275, rue Notre Dame Est, Montréal, H2Y 1C6, CA

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Montréal est la plus grande ville francophone d’Amérique et elle se distingue par sa vitalité culturelle exceptionnelle et des forces créatrices reconnues mondialement. Elle se développe un peu plus chaque jour en une ville contemporaine, inclusive et dynamique sur ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,282
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Programme 2030 Canada

Programme 2030 Canada

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Programme 2030 Canada in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Ville de Montréal has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Programme 2030 Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Programme 2030 Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ville de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ville de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Programme 2030 Canada

Programme 2030 Canada

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIL1785335027

FAQ

Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada and Ville de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada and Ville de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Programme 2030 Canada or Ville de Montréal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Programme 2030 Canada or Ville de Montréal ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada and Ville de Montréal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Programme 2030 Canada and Ville de Montréal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9