Comparison Overview
Profiles by Kantar

Profiles by Kantar
Bridgewater, New Jersey, US, 08807
Last Update: 27/02/2026
A division of Kantar, Kantar Profiles is a market-leading data company and home to the world’s largest audience network. With our industry-leading quality measures, fraud detection, and decades of experience - we are the most trusted panel provider in the industry. Ou...

Ipsos
35 Rue du Val de Marne, Paris, 75013, FR
Last Update: 08/09/2026
In our world of rapid change, the need for reliable information to make confident decisions has never been greater. At Ipsos we believe our clients need more than a data supplier, they need a partner who can produce accurate and relevant information and turn it into ac...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Profiles by Kantar







Ipsos






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Market Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Profiles by Kantar in 2026.
Incidents vs Market Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ipsos in 2026.
Incident History - Profiles by Kantar (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Profiles by Kantar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ipsos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ipsos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Profiles by Kantar

Ipsos
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.