Proctor School District
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 700 and 749
None
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
Proctor School District
VS
University of California
University of California
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849
No other university does as much for so many as the University of California. For almost 150 years, the University of California has educated the brightest minds and helped California become a beacon of innovation. Our campuses routinely are ranked among the best in the world. But our reach extends beyond campus borders. Our people connect the dots, exchange ideas, make advancements and unlock the secrets and mysteries of the universe every day. They engage local governments and underserved schools, save lives and improve health, protect the environment and push the boundaries of space. And it adds up to an immense direct impact on the economy. UC supports 430,000 jobs and contributes over $46 billion to the California economy each year.
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 154,345
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Proctor School District
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
University of California
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Proctor School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of California
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proctor School District in 2025.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of California in 2025.
Incident History — Proctor School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proctor School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — University of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Proctor School District
Incidents
Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
FAQ
University of California company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Proctor School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
University of California company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Proctor School District company.
In the current year, University of California company and Proctor School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Both University of California company and Proctor School District company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.
University of California company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Proctor School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither University of California company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Proctor School District company nor University of California company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
University of California company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Proctor School District company.
University of California company employs more people globally than Proctor School District company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of California holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
