Comparison Overview
Procter & Gamble Philippines

Procter & Gamble Philippines
5th Avenue, Taguig, PH
Last Update: 22/03/2026
P&G started operations in the Philippines over 80 years ago, and P&G Philippines is now the third oldest P&G subsidiary globally. It all started in 1908, when two American ex-troopers set up a partnership under the name Manila Refining Company, which manufactured candle...

Alpargatas S.A.
Av. das Nações Unidas, 14.261, São Paulo, 04794-000, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are a global company, founded and based in Brazil for over 115 years. We are committed to delight the world with amazing brands, that convey lightness and joy to the everyday lives of our consumers. We own Havaianas brand, world leader in open shoes, known for the ic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Procter & Gamble Philippines







Alpargatas S.A.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble Philippines in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Alpargatas S.A. in 2026.
Incident History - Procter & Gamble Philippines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procter & Gamble Philippines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Alpargatas S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Alpargatas S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Procter & Gamble Philippines

Alpargatas S.A.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.