Comparison Overview
Procter & Gamble India

Procter & Gamble India
Procter & Gamble Plaza, Mumbai, 400099, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
P&G was founded over 180 years ago as a soap and candle company. In India, P&G’s history started in 1985 with the acquisition of Richardson Hindustan Limited (RHL). Today we touch the lives of hundreds of millions of consumers in India with our portfolio of 13 leading a...

Prysmian
Via Chiese 6, Milan, Italy, IT, 20126
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Prysmian is a global cabling solutions provider leading the energy transition and digital transformation. By leveraging its wide geographical footprint and extensive product range, its track record of technological leadership and innovation, and a strong customer base, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Procter & Gamble India







Prysmian






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble India in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prysmian in 2026.
Incident History - Procter & Gamble India (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procter & Gamble India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prysmian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prysmian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Procter & Gamble India

Prysmian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.