Comparison Overview
Procter & Gamble Deutschland

Procter & Gamble Deutschland
Sulzbacher Strasse 40, Schwalbach am Taunus, DE
Last Update: 24/03/2026
Procter & Gamble (P&G) bietet Verbrauchern auf der ganzen Welt eines der stärksten Portfolios mit qualitativ hochwertigen und führenden Marken wie Always®, Ambi Pur®, Ariel®, Bounty®, Braun®, Charmin®, Crest®, Dawn®, Downy®, Fairy®, Febreze®, Gain®, Gillette®, Head&Shou...

DS Smith
1 Paddington Square, Level 3, LONDON, GB, W2 1DL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
DS Smith provides innovative packaging solutions, paper products and recycling services with a commitment to sustainability and a circular economy. Our core purpose is to Redefine Packaging for a Changing World, and our expert teams work closely with like-minded partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Procter & Gamble Deutschland







DS Smith






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble Deutschland in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DS Smith in 2026.
Incident History - Procter & Gamble Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procter & Gamble Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DS Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DS Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Procter & Gamble Deutschland

DS Smith
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.