Comparison Overview
Procter & Gamble Malaysia

Procter & Gamble Malaysia
N/A
Last Update: 15/12/2025
P&G is a global and leading consumer goods company that has been in operation for over 180 years across 70 countries. For generations, we’ve challenged the norm and inspired the future—from the products we put on the shelf to the people we bring on our team. Our purpose...

Godrej Enterprises Group
N/A
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Since 1897, Godrej Enterprises Group (which includes Godrej & Boyce and its affiliates) has contributed significantly to India’s economic growth and self-reliance by providing complex engineering, design led innovation, and sustainable manufacturing solutions. From the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Procter & Gamble Malaysia







Godrej Enterprises Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble Malaysia in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Godrej Enterprises Group in 2026.
Incident History - Procter & Gamble Malaysia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procter & Gamble Malaysia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Godrej Enterprises Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Godrej Enterprises Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Procter & Gamble Malaysia

Godrej Enterprises Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.