Comparison Overview
Procreate

Procreate
304 Elizabeth Street, North Hobart, Tasmania, AU, 7000
Last Update: 22/02/2026
We’ve been developing creative tools for iPad and iPhone since 2011. Our apps, Procreate, Procreate Dreams, and Procreate Pocket, have reached and stayed at #1 in Apple’s App Store for over eight years. Independently owned, based in a beautiful pocket of Australia, we ...

SS&C Technologies
80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, US, 06095
Last Update: 12/09/2026
SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 fi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Procreate







SS&C Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procreate in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Procreate (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procreate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Procreate

SS&C Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.