Comparison Overview
Process Engineering Specialists

Process Engineering Specialists
Vision Exchange, Singapore, 608526, SG
Last Update: 03/05/2026
Process Engineering Specialists (PES) is an international leader in the provision of Project Management, Commissioning & Qualification and Automation services, and outsourced expertise within the Pharmaceutical and related sectors. Headquartered in Singapore, and addit...

L&T Technology Services
L&T Knowledge City, West Block, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390019, IN
Last Update: 26/03/2026
L&T Technology Services (LTTS) is one of the world’s leading engineering and technology service providers. With operations in over 25 countries and a growing annual revenue that now surpasses USD 1.2 billion, we work with organizations who design, develop or deliver p...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Process Engineering Specialists







L&T Technology Services






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Process Engineering Specialists in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for L&T Technology Services in 2026.
Incident History - Process Engineering Specialists (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Process Engineering Specialists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - L&T Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
L&T Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Process Engineering Specialists

L&T Technology Services
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.