Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ProAgProAg
VS
MapfreMapfre
ProAg

ProAg

N/A

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.proag.com
753/1000Fair

ProAg is proud of its almost century of experience as an agricultural risk management company and is committed to providing our agents and policyholders with excellent service and support for multiple peril crop, crop hail and named peril crop insurance products. We are...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:384
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mapfre

Mapfre

Carretera de Pozuelo, 52, Majadahonda, Community of Madrid, ES, 28220

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mapfre.com
785/1000Fair

At Mapfre, we’ve spent more than 90 years supporting people and businesses around the world, taking care of what matters most to them. We offer insurance, financial, and service solutions that evolve with you. Our experience and commitment, combined with a constant focu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:37,331
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ProAg

ProAg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mapfre

Mapfre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProAg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mapfre in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ProAg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProAg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mapfre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mapfre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ProAg

ProAg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mapfre

Mapfre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ProAg company and Mapfre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ProAg and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ProAg and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ProAg or Mapfre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ProAg or Mapfre ?
Between ProAg and Mapfre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ProAg and Mapfre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-55175
SUMMARY

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-44383
SUMMARY

Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-42952
SUMMARY

Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-20744
SUMMARY

The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-15089
SUMMARY

vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES