Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pro-Torque Engineering & Project ManagementPro-Torque Engineering & Project Management
VS
ShellShell
Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

Newcastle, 2300, AU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://protorque.com.au/
743/1000Moderate

Pro-Torque is in the problem-solving business. We make the lives of leading players in the oil, gas, shipping and petroleum industries easier. Our expertise in engineering and project management navigates safe and timely project delivery, including preventative and rea...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shell

Shell

York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.shell.com
835/1000Good

Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose i...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:185,291
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shell

Shell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Shell has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shell

Shell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AST-TESHE1773679185

FAQ

Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management company and Shell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management or Shell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management or Shell ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management and Shell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pro-Torque Engineering & Project Management and Shell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA