Comparison Overview

Privatklinik Hohenegg

VS

Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado

Privatklinik Hohenegg

Hohenegg 1, Meilen, 8706, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Die Privatklinik Hohenegg ist für erwachsene Patientinnen und Patienten da, die in einer psychischen Krise die bestmögliche fachliche Betreuung und eine auf ihre Persönlichkeit abgestimmte individuelle Behandlung benötigen. Die Klinik nimmt Personen mit Privat- und Halbprivatversicherung sowie Selbstzahler aus dem In- und deutschsprachigen Ausland auf. Sie ist unter anderem spezialisiert auf die Behandlung von Depressiven Erkrankungen, Burnout und Belastungskrisen, Angsterkrankungen, Alterspsychotherapie und Psychosomatische Erkrankungen. Die Verantwortung dafür liegt in den Händen von erfahrenen Fachärzten sowie qualifizierten Therapie- und Pflegefachpersonen. Die Hohenegg verfügt über 70 Betten und bietet eine Hotellerie mit erstklassigem Komfort in einer einzigartigen Atmosphäre, in der sich Patientinnen und Patienten aufgehoben fühlen. Als fachlich führend in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie profiliert sich die Privatklinik Hohenegg mit herausragender Kompetenz in der Wiederherstellung und der Erhaltung der psychischen Gesundheit, mit ganzheitlichen Behandlungskonzepten und einer ästhetisch-harmonischen Infrastruktur. Unsere Werte «kompetent, exklusiv und authentisch» spiegeln das Ergebnis unseres Auftrages, dem wir seit über 100 Jahren verpflichtet sind: Menschen in seelischer Not eine gute, kompetente Behandlung zu bieten. Sie stehen für unsere humanistische, werteorientierte Tradition, in der wir die Beziehungen zu Patientinnen und Patienten, Mitarbeitenden und weiteren Anspruchsgruppen echt und glaubwürdig gestalten. Es ist unser Bestreben, erstklassige und persönlich erlebbare Qualität zu bieten. Als Mitglied von Swiss Leading Hospitals (SLH) und ausgezeichnet mit dem EFQM-Qualitätslabel verpflichten wir uns, anspruchsvolle und strenge Qualitätsstandards zu erfüllen. In den Patientenbefragungen der ANQ gehört die Privatklinik Hohenegg seit vielen Jahren in den Kategorien zur Symptom-Reduktion zu den Besten.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado

7275 Kipling St, Arvada, Colorado, 80005, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado provides counseling and psychotherapy to clients of all ages with the assistance of our therapy animals. Linda Chassman and Ellen Winston founded AATPC in 2010 based on their belief in the powerful effect animals have in healing and facilitating change. AATPC became a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization in 2013 because we found that more than half of our clients were low-income, on Medicaid, Medicare, or CHP+, or were veterans. We wanted to be able to make the benefits of animal-assisted therapy available to everyone who contacted us, regardless of their ability to pay. Our mission is to make the benefits of animal-assisted mental health therapy accessible to people of all ages, income levels, insurance statuses and life circumstances. The program is specifically geared to serve economically, physically, and/or mentally disadvantaged individuals and families. AATPC offers Denver-metro area clients and their families the opportunity to improve their psychological and mental health through strategic therapy sessions with a trained Animal Assisted Therapy Counseling therapist or intern. Because we are considered pioneers in the development of Animal Assisted Therapy as an integral part of counseling and psychotherapy, we provide a range of other services for mental health professionals, including in-person trainings, an online Certificate in Animal Assisted Psychotherapy program, agency consultation and training, and group or individual consultation and supervision.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/privatklinik-hohenegg.jpeg
Privatklinik Hohenegg
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/animal-assisted-therapy-programs-of-colorado.jpeg
Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Privatklinik Hohenegg
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Privatklinik Hohenegg in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado in 2026.

Incident History — Privatklinik Hohenegg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Privatklinik Hohenegg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/privatklinik-hohenegg.jpeg
Privatklinik Hohenegg
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/animal-assisted-therapy-programs-of-colorado.jpeg
Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Privatklinik Hohenegg company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Privatklinik Hohenegg company.

In the current year, Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company and Privatklinik Hohenegg company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company nor Privatklinik Hohenegg company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company nor Privatklinik Hohenegg company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company nor Privatklinik Hohenegg company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg company nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg company nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Privatklinik Hohenegg company employs more people globally than Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Privatklinik Hohenegg nor Animal Assisted Therapy Programs of Colorado holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N