What is the official website of Privacy and Data Security ?

The official website of Privacy and Data Security is http://www.taftlaw.com/practices/93-privacy-and-data-security.

What is Privacy and Data Security's cybersecurity risk score?

Privacy and Data Security has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Privacy and Data Security experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Privacy and Data Security been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Privacy and Data Security have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Privacy and Data Security have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Privacy and Data Security comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Privacy and Data Security have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Privacy and Data Security comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Privacy and Data Security is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Privacy and Data Security have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Privacy and Data Security is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Privacy and Data Security operate in ?

Privacy and Data Security operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.

How many employees does Privacy and Data Security have ?

Privacy and Data Security employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Privacy and Data Security own any subsidiaries ?

Privacy and Data Security presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Privacy and Data Security have ?

Privacy and Data Security's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 245 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Privacy and Data Security ?

Privacy and Data Security is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.

Does Privacy and Data Security have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Privacy and Data Security does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Privacy and Data Security have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Privacy and Data Security maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/privacy-and-data-security.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Privacy and Data Security experienced ?

As of July 7, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Privacy and Data Security has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Privacy and Data Security have ?

Privacy and Data Security has an estimated 7,911 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PDS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

Privacy and Data Security Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

taftlaw.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Our Privacy and Data Security attorneys help clients assess their compliance and identify the areas in need of improvement. Since responding to data breaches often requires a multi-faceted and rapid-response approach, Taft’s privacy and data security attorneys reflect expertise drawn from broad and significant legal experiences across our firm. We encourage you to visit our Privacy and Data Security blog, where we share additional articles about the latest industry topics. To read our blog, click here: https://www.privacyanddatasecurityinsight.com/

PDS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

PDS

Privacy and Data Security CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

PDS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PDS

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Privacy and Data Security in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Privacy and Data Security in 2026.

Incident Types PDS vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Privacy and Data Security in 2026.

Incident History - PDS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Privacy and Data Security Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PDS

Legal Services

Website: http://www.taftlaw.com/practices/93-privacy-and-data-security

Company Size: 501-1,000 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Privacy and Data Security Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Privacy and Data Security CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 06, 2026 06:02 AM

HHS and state AGs fine ambulance firm over $500,000, require enhanced security, privacy, and data minimization practices

Earlier this year, the Attorneys General of Massachusetts and Connecticut entered into settlement agreements with Comstar, LLC, an ambulance...

Read Article

February 26, 2026 08:00 AM

Trends In Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

Our healthcare data breach statistics clearly show an upward trend in data breaches since 2009, when OCR first started publishing data...

Read Article

February 16, 2026 08:00 AM

Dutch Data Protection Authority Warns OpenClaw AI Agents Pose Major Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks

The AP is urging individuals and organizations to avoid using OpenClaw and similar systems on devices containing sensitive or confidential...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:15 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

On February 12, 2018, the Luxembourg data protection authority (Commission nationale pour la protection des donées, “CNPD”) published on its website (in...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:15 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Hunton & Williams Receives Global Band 1 Ranking for Data Protection by Chambers. Chambers & Partners ranked Hunton & Williams LLP's Global Privacy and...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:13 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

On April 27, 2016, the UK House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee (the “Committee”) confirmed Elizabeth Denham's appointment as...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:12 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Entry into Force of the French Digital Republic Bill. On October 7, 2016, the French Digital Republic Bill (the “Bill”) was enacted after a final vote from...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:12 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

EDPS Issues Opinion and Launches Regulation App for Mobile Devices. On July 27, 2015, Giovanni Buttarelli, the European Data Protection Supervisor (“EDPS”),...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:11 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Hunton and Williams Hosts Cornell University's Privacy and Data Security Symposium. On June 18, 2013, the New York office of Hunton & Williams LLP office...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-53646

SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.6 through 0.7.2, when a `ClientPasswordReset` record already exists for a client (from a previous unexpired reset request), subsequent calls to the `reset_password` guest API endpoint reuse the existing token instead of generating a new one. The 15-minute validity window is anchored to the first request's `created_at` timestamp, not the time of the most recent email. An attacker who obtained the original reset link remains able to use it even after the victim requests a new reset, because the original token is never invalidated or rotated. Version 0.8.0 patches the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password` endpoint to minimize the window of opportunity, and/or manually clear expired `client_password_reset` records from the database after a client reports a suspected compromise.

Published

Date2026-07-06

Updated

Date2026-07-06

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-vp66-w6rc-x32p

CVE-2026-53645

SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 allow a low-privileged staff account to grant arbitrary module permissions to itself through the admin API, resulting in persistent privilege escalation. A staff user that only has `staff.create_and_edit_staff` can call `/api/admin/staff/permissions_update` targeting their own account and write any permission structure, bypassing the intended role-based access control boundary. Version 0.8.0 patches the issue. Some workarounds are available. Restrict the `staff.create_and_edit_staff` permission to only highly trusted staff members and/or use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to `/api/admin/staff/permissions_update` to specific trusted roles.

Published

Date2026-07-06

Updated

Date2026-07-06

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-4hf7-xxxw-64rm

CVE-2026-53644

SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions 0.5.3 through 0.7.2 allow authenticated clients to both read and reset API key service secrets for orders that are no longer in an `active` state (e.g., `suspended`, `canceled`). The root cause is missing order-state validation in two client API endpoints, despite an `isActive()` helper already existing in the `Serviceapikey` module and the frontend UI correctly gating access on `order.status == 'active'`. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. Some workarounds are available. If the `Serviceapikey` module is not needed, uninstall it to remove the affected endpoints. One may also use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to `/api/client/order/service` and `/api/client/serviceapikey/reset` based on application-level order-state logic.

Published

Date2026-07-06

Updated

Date2026-07-06

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-qf6j-vq68-qmfh

CVE-2026-53643

SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 allow low-privileged staff accounts to perform unauthorized actions via admin API endpoints. The root cause is a combination of the `can_always_access` module flag (which grants all staff access to certain modules) and insufficient permission checks or unsafe parameter handling on individual endpoints. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. Some workarounds are available. Restrict staff accounts to only those who need access to sensitive settings and/or use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to the affected endpoints to trusted IP addresses or higher-privilege roles.

Published

Date2026-07-06

Updated

Date2026-07-06

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-563q-g4r4-6f9m

CVE-2026-53642

SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.6 through 0.7.2, when the "Require Email Confirmation" setting is enabled, a logged-in client with an unverified email address (`email_approved = 0`) can access all client-area pages (e.g. `/client/balance`, `/client/order/list`, `/client/invoice`) and read real account data, including wallet balances and transaction history. The API-side enforcement correctly restricts unverified clients to only profile-related endpoints, but the page-side enforcement is overly permissive, allowing any request whose path starts with `/client`. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. No known workarounds that don't involve modifying the source code are available.

Published

Date2026-07-06

Updated

Date2026-07-06

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-7v47-rh46-w923

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…