Comparison Overview

Princeton Einstein Museum of Science

VS

Discovery Gateway Children's Museum

Princeton Einstein Museum of Science

26 Sycamore Place, Princeton, 08540, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Albert Einstein could have chosen to live nearly anywhere when he left Germany in 1933 but he selected Princeton, New Jersey as his new hometown. Now, more than 65 years after his death, it is time to immortalize his achievements with a museum in Princeton. Join us as we build the Princeton Einstein Museum of Science (PEMS), the only museum outside of Europe dedicated to his legacy. From a video immersion room explaining aspects of gravity, to fabulous, large-scale art interpreting Dr. Einstein’s discoveries, PEMS aims to be lively, fun, educational, and in the end, highly inspirational. Aimed at non-scientists, PEMS will inspire future physicists, mathematicians, and cosmologists by bringing the wonder of Dr. Einstein’s methods and discoveries to the world. Help us bring this exciting experience to life!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Discovery Gateway Children's Museum

444 W 100 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Learn through play! Our mission is to inspire children of all ages to imagine, discover, and connect with their world to make a difference. Founded in 1978 as The Children's Museum of Utah, we have a thirty-year history of dedicated service to the families of Utah and the Intermountain West. Since moving to our new location in 2006, more than 1,250,000 children, parents, and educators have explored our facility and our hands-on, educational exhibits and programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-einstein-museum-of-science.jpeg
Princeton Einstein Museum of Science
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-gateway-children's-museum.jpeg
Discovery Gateway Children's Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Princeton Einstein Museum of Science
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Discovery Gateway Children's Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Princeton Einstein Museum of Science in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discovery Gateway Children's Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Princeton Einstein Museum of Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Princeton Einstein Museum of Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Discovery Gateway Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discovery Gateway Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-einstein-museum-of-science.jpeg
Princeton Einstein Museum of Science
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-gateway-children's-museum.jpeg
Discovery Gateway Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company.

In the current year, Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company and Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company nor Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company nor Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company nor Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Discovery Gateway Children's Museum company employs more people globally than Princeton Einstein Museum of Science company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Princeton Einstein Museum of Science nor Discovery Gateway Children's Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N