Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Taylor Prime Labels & PackagingTaylor Prime Labels & Packaging
VS
Avery DennisonAvery Dennison
Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

2020 Lookout Drive, North Mankato, MN, 56003, US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
740/1000Moderate

Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging is part of Taylor, one of the five largest graphic communications companies in North America. We are a recognized leader in the design and manufacture of prime labels and packaging products. From flexible packaging, shrink sleeves, roll-f...

NAICS:326
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Mentor, Ohio, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://averydennison.com
776/1000Fair

We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:21,695
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging or Avery Dennison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging or Avery Dennison ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging and Avery Dennison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Taylor Prime Labels & Packaging and Avery Dennison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9