Comparison Overview
Prima AFP

Prima AFP
Calle Chinchón 980 San Isidro, Lima, 27, PE
Last Update: 03/02/2026
AFP líder que cuenta con el sólido respaldo del Grupo Crédito y sus más de 130 años de experiencia en el mercado financiero peruano. Nuestro propósito es acompañar y guiar a nuestros clientes en su progreso. Ayer. Hoy. Siempre.

PING AN
No. 5033 Yitian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518046, CN
Last Update: 07/10/2026
This is the official Company Page of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (HKEx: 2318; SSE: 601318; ADR: PNGAY). Ping An strives to become a world leading technology-powered financial services group. We believe the way people receive financial services an...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Prima AFP







PING AN






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prima AFP in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PING AN in 2026.
Incident History - Prima AFP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prima AFP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PING AN (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PING AN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Prima AFP

PING AN
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.