Comparison Overview
Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau

Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau
1745 Broadway, New York, 10019, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau is a part of Penguin Random House, the world’s most global trade book publisher. The Speakers Bureau represents an unrivaled roster of speakers whose work is shaping national conversations—on and off the page. We work with venues...

Forbes
Jersey City, NJ, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as w...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau







Forbes






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau in 2026.
Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Forbes in 2026.
Incident History - Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Forbes (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Forbes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau

Forbes
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.