Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Premium Retail ServicesPremium Retail Services
VS
Love's Travel StopsLove's Travel Stops
Premium Retail Services

Premium Retail Services

618 Spirit Dr, Chesterfield, 63005, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://premiumretail.com
782/1000Fair

We work across the U.S. and Canada to help brands build winning strategies in stores and beyond. We're approved, preferred, and winning sales in more retail channels than anyone. We leverage teams of product experts to train retail associates and engage customers, makin...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:5,947
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Love's Travel Stops

Love's Travel Stops

10601 N Pennsylvania, Oklahoma City, 73120, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.loves.com
790/1000Fair

Founded in 1964 by Tom Love, Love’s Family of Companies is headquartered in Oklahoma City, and remains entirely family-owned and operated. With more than 600 locations in 42 states, Love’s approximate growth rate is 40 stores per year. From the first filling station in ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:15,260
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Premium Retail Services

Premium Retail Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Love's Travel Stops

Love's Travel Stops

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Premium Retail Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Love's Travel Stops in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Premium Retail Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Premium Retail Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Love's Travel Stops (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Love's Travel Stops cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Premium Retail Services

Premium Retail Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Love's Travel Stops

Love's Travel Stops

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Premium Retail Services company and Love's Travel Stops company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Premium Retail Services and Love's Travel Stops, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Premium Retail Services and Love's Travel Stops, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Premium Retail Services or Love's Travel Stops ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Premium Retail Services or Love's Travel Stops ?
Between Premium Retail Services and Love's Travel Stops, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Premium Retail Services and Love's Travel Stops, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2