Comparison Overview
Preferred Materials, Inc
Preferred Materials, Inc
4636 Scarborough Drive, Lutz, FL, 33559, US
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Preferred Materials, Inc., A CRH Company, is a leading supplier of asphalt, concrete, concrete products, and paving services in the Southeast, with 13 asphalt plants, 33 ready mixed plants, and more than 1,950 dedicated and trained professionals. Preferred Materials is...
Masco Corporation
17450 College Parkway, Livonia, 48152, US
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Masco Corporation is a global leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of branded home improvement and building products. Our products enhance the way consumers all over the world experience and enjoy their living spaces. Our portfolio of industry-leading bran...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Preferred Materials, Inc
Masco Corporation
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Preferred Materials, Inc in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Masco Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - Preferred Materials, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Preferred Materials, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Masco Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Masco Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Preferred Materials, Inc
Masco Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.