Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Preferred Brands International, Inc.Preferred Brands International, Inc.
VS
HMSHostHMSHost
Preferred Brands International, Inc.

Preferred Brands International, Inc.

3 Landmark Square, None, Stamford, CT, US, 06901

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tastybite.com
760/1000Fair

WHO WE ARE For over 25 years, Tasty Bite® has been making fast, flavorful and all natural ethnic food - including entrees, sauces and rices - to delight consumers. And since we believe that good food shouldn't come at the expense of people or the planet, we proudly give...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:27
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HMSHost

HMSHost

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hmshost.com
781/1000Fair

HMSHost is recognized by the industry as the leader in travel dining with awards such as Restaurateur with the Highest Regard for Customer Service and Best Brand Restaurateur for Shake Shack by Airport Experience News. USA Today 10Best Readers’ Choice Travel Awards gave...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,256
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Preferred Brands International, Inc.

Preferred Brands International, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HMSHost

HMSHost

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Preferred Brands International, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HMSHost in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Preferred Brands International, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Preferred Brands International, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HMSHost (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HMSHost cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Preferred Brands International, Inc.

Preferred Brands International, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HMSHost

HMSHost

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. company and HMSHost company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. and HMSHost, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. and HMSHost, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Preferred Brands International, Inc. or HMSHost ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Preferred Brands International, Inc. or HMSHost ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. and HMSHost, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Preferred Brands International, Inc. and HMSHost, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA