Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do CampoPrefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo
VS
Workingfor.beWorkingfor.be
Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

N/A

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
770/1000Fair

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:5,105
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.workingfor.be
782/1000Fair

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choos...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo or Workingfor.be ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo or Workingfor.be ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo and Workingfor.be, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo and Workingfor.be, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2