Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Praxis Home Retail LimitedPraxis Home Retail Limited
VS
Burlington Stores, Inc.Burlington Stores, Inc.
Praxis Home Retail Limited

Praxis Home Retail Limited

iThink Techno Campus, Kanjur Marg (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400042, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.praxisretail.in
758/1000Fair

Pioneering in home retail in India, we are a value driven company with a passion for creating a ‘better life at home’ for people. We started our journey in 2007 with our first store in Noida as a one-stop shop destination for home solutions. Our product assortment is w...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:475
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burlington Stores, Inc.

Burlington Stores, Inc.

2006 Route 130, Burlington, NJ, US, 08016

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.burlington.com
811/1000Good

Burlington Stores, Inc., headquartered in New Jersey, is a nationally recognized off-price retailer. Burlington is a Fortune 500 company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BURL.” The Company operates more than 1000 sto...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:38,158
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Praxis Home Retail Limited

Praxis Home Retail Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burlington Stores, Inc.

Burlington Stores, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Praxis Home Retail Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burlington Stores, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Praxis Home Retail Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Praxis Home Retail Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burlington Stores, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burlington Stores, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Praxis Home Retail Limited

Praxis Home Retail Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burlington Stores, Inc.

Burlington Stores, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited company and Burlington Stores, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited and Burlington Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited and Burlington Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Praxis Home Retail Limited or Burlington Stores, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Praxis Home Retail Limited or Burlington Stores, Inc. ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited and Burlington Stores, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Praxis Home Retail Limited and Burlington Stores, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1