Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Præhospitalet, Region MidtjyllandPræhospitalet, Region Midtjylland
VS
MultiCare Health SystemMultiCare Health System
Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

Olof Palmes Allé 34, Aarhus N, Midtjylland, 8200, DK

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ph.rm.dk
763/1000Fair

Præhospitalet i Region Midtjylland er et hospital på hjul. Vores primære opgave består i at sikre en koordineret sundhedsfaglig hjælp, når borgere i regionen kommer alvorligt til skade eller bliver akut og livstruende syge. Hjælpen ydes blandt andet i form af ambulancer...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:305
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

315 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Tacoma, WA, US, 98415

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://jobs.multicare.org
719/1000Moderate

MultiCare’s roots in the Pacific Northwest go back to 1882, with the founding of Tacoma’s first hospital. Over the years, we’ve grown from a Tacoma-centric, hospital-based organization into the largest, community-based, locally governed health system in the state of Wa...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,426
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MultiCare Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MultiCare Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MultiCare Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MUL20314123
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MUL752072725

FAQ

Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland and MultiCare Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland and MultiCare Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland or MultiCare Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland or MultiCare Health System ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland and MultiCare Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Præhospitalet, Region Midtjylland and MultiCare Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8