Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PraderLosinger SAPraderLosinger SA
VS
Mott MacDonaldMott MacDonald
PraderLosinger SA

PraderLosinger SA

Route de Vissigen 110, Sion, 1950, CH

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

PraderLosinger opère depuis 1925. Grâce à ses ambassadeurs, jeunes gens du métier et de la maison attachés à des régions spécifiques du Valais, elle répond en connaissance de cause à vos demandes les plus spécifiques. Prenez rendez-vous, exposez vos attentes et nos solu...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:55
Subsidiaries:100
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

10 Fleet Place, London, EC4M 7, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://mottmac.com
800/1000Good

We are an engineering, management and development consultancy and one of the largest wholly employee-owned firms of our kind. We plan, design, deliver and maintain the transport, energy, water, defence and security, and buildings infrastructure that is integral to peo...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:24,383
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PraderLosinger SA

PraderLosinger SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PraderLosinger SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mott MacDonald in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PraderLosinger SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PraderLosinger SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mott MacDonald (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mott MacDonald cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PraderLosinger SA

PraderLosinger SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PraderLosinger SA company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PraderLosinger SA and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PraderLosinger SA and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PraderLosinger SA or Mott MacDonald ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PraderLosinger SA or Mott MacDonald ?
Between PraderLosinger SA and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PraderLosinger SA and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53465
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, a crafted multi-frame can result in a heap buffer over-write when encoding it with the SF3 encoder. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53464
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, when providing invalid options to the wand option parser a small memory leak will occur. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53463
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when passing incorrect arguments in the distort operation a null pointer deference will occur. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53462
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-53461
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, an incorrect loop in the ICON decoder can result in an out of bounds heap write resulting in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9