Comparison Overview

Prada Group

VS

Pandora

Prada Group

Via Antonio Fogazzaro, 28, None, Milan , Milan , IT, 20135
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

The Prada Group is a global leader in the luxury industry and a pioneer in its unconventional dialogue with contemporary society across diverse cultural spheres. Home to prestigious brands as Prada, Miu Miu, Church’s, Car Shoe, Marchesi 1824 and Luna Rossa, the Group remains committed to enhancing their value by increasing their visibility and desirability over time. Promoting creativity and sustainable growth, the Group offers its brands a shared vision that gives each of them the opportunity to stand out and express their essence. With 26 owned factories and over 14,800 employees, the Group designs and produces ready-to-wear, leather goods, footwear and jewellery collections, and distributes its products in more than 70 countries, through 606 Directly Operated Stores (DOS), e-commerce channels and selected e-tailers and department stores. Prada Group also operates in the eyewear and beauty sectors through licensing agreements with industry leaders. Prada S.p.A. is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange as 1913.

NAICS: 4483
NAICS Definition: Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees: 11,309
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pandora

Havneholmen 17-19, Copenhagen, 1561, DK
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749

Pandora is the world’s largest jewellery brand. The company designs, manufactures and markets hand-finished jewellery made from high-quality materials at affordable prices Pandora jewellery is sold in more than 100 countries through more than 6,500 points of sale, including more than 2,500 concept stores. Headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, Pandora employs 32,000 people worldwide and crafts its jewellery at two LEED-certified facilities in Thailand using mainly recycled silver and gold. Pandora is committed to leadership in sustainability and has set science-based targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50% across its own operations and value chain by 2030. The company is listed on the Nasdaq Copenhagen stock exchange and generated revenue of DKK 26.5 billion (EUR 3.6 billion) in 2022. See all our products and collections on pandora.net Visit our guidelines for this channel, and what types of post we accept here: https://pandoragroup.com/media/Corporate-social-media-principles

NAICS: 4483
NAICS Definition: Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees: 20,836
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pradagroup.jpeg
Prada Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandora-a-s.jpeg
Pandora
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prada Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pandora
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prada Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pandora in 2026.

Incident History — Prada Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prada Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pandora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pandora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pradagroup.jpeg
Prada Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandora-a-s.jpeg
Pandora
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Supply Chain Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Prada Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pandora company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pandora company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prada Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pandora company and Prada Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pandora company nor Prada Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pandora company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prada Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pandora company nor Prada Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prada Group company nor Pandora company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prada Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pandora company.

Pandora company employs more people globally than Prada Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prada Group nor Pandora holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.