Comparison Overview
Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada

Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada
Ottawa, K1A0H8, CA
Last Update: 09/02/2026
The Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC) is a national, independent and accountable prosecuting authority whose main objective is to prosecute federal offences and provide legal advice and assistance to law enforcement agencies. The PPSC prosecutes cases under f...

European Commission
Rue de la loi, Brussels, 1049, BE
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The Commission represents and upholds the interests of the EU as a whole, and is independent of national governments. The European Commission prepares legislation for adoption by the Council (representing the member countries) and the Parliament (representing the citiz...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada







European Commission






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
European Commission has 466.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - European Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)
European Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Public Prosecution Service of Canada | Service des poursuites pénales du Canada

European Commission
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.