Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PPG's Packaging Coatings BusinessPPG's Packaging Coatings Business
VS
Tetra PakTetra Pak
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

1 PPG Pl, Pittsburgh, 15272, US

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
739/1000Moderate

PPG: WE PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY THE WORLD® At PPG's Packaging Coatings business, we are dedicated to delivering innovative solutions for nearly every metal can application in the beverage, food and personal care industries. Our solutions are built around meeting your goal...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

70 Avenue Général-Guisan, CH-1009 PULLY/LAUSANNE, Case Postale 446, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tetrapak.com
789/1000Fair

We’re here to make food safe and available. It’s why we provide advanced food production systems, from product creation and recipe testing to processing, filling, packaging, logistics, services and beyond. We support almost every food and beverage category with tailored...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:25,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPG's Packaging Coatings Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tetra Pak in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tetra Pak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tetra Pak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business or Tetra Pak ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business or Tetra Pak ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA