Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PPG's Packaging Coatings BusinessPPG's Packaging Coatings Business
VS
Tetra PakTetra Pak
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

1 PPG Pl, Pittsburgh, 15272, US

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
739/1000Moderate

PPG: WE PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY THE WORLD® At PPG's Packaging Coatings business, we are dedicated to delivering innovative solutions for nearly every metal can application in the beverage, food and personal care industries. Our solutions are built around meeting your goal...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

70 Avenue Général-Guisan, CH-1009 PULLY/LAUSANNE, Case Postale 446, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tetrapak.com
789/1000Fair

We’re here to make food safe and available. It’s why we provide advanced food production systems, from product creation and recipe testing to processing, filling, packaging, logistics, services and beyond. We support almost every food and beverage category with tailored...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:25,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPG's Packaging Coatings Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tetra Pak in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tetra Pak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tetra Pak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

PPG's Packaging Coatings Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business or Tetra Pak ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PPG's Packaging Coatings Business or Tetra Pak ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PPG's Packaging Coatings Business and Tetra Pak, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA