Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PPD™ RWE, Strategy and AccessPPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access
VS
Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos National Laboratory
PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

We are the preeminent provider of integrated, evidence-based PPD™ Evidera™ solutions and PPD™ CorEvitas™ solutions that demonstrate the real-world effectiveness, safety and value of biopharmaceutical and biotechnology products from early development through loss of excl...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, US, 87545

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lanl.gov/
776/1000Fair

Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes ...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:13,101
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Alamos National Laboratory in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Los Alamos National Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Alamos National Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PPD™ RWE, Strategy and Access and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2