Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Powercom (Pty) LtdPowercom (Pty) Ltd
VS
PTCL.OfficialPTCL.Official
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

No 6, Robert Mugabe Avenue, Windhoek, NA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.powercom.na
635/1000Poor

PowerCom is an ICT infrastructure and equipment provider. The company is a subsidiary of Telecom Namibia Limited since 2013. PowerCom's services is currently focused on telecommunications infrastructure namely Towers , with a portfolio of over 300 towers and 29 roof ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Block-E, Sector G-8/4, Islamabad, 44000, PK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ptcl.com.pk
793/1000Fair

𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: To be the leading and most admired Telecom and ICT provider in and for Pakistan. 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: To be the partner of choice for our customers, to develop our people and to deliver value to our shareholders. 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀: Be resilie...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,945
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Powercom (Pty) Ltd has 47.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PTCL.Official in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Powercom (Pty) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Powercom (Pty) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PTCL.Official (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PTCL.Official cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Powercom (Pty) Ltd or PTCL.Official ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Powercom (Pty) Ltd or PTCL.Official ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and PTCL.Official, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and PTCL.Official, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8