Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & RenewablesParker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables
VS
FLSmidthFLSmidth
Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

6035 Parkland Blvd , Cleveland, 44124, US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile

Parker is the world’s leading diversified original equipment manufacturer of motion and control technologies and systems, providing precision engineered solutions for a wide variety of markets, including power generation. As a collaborative partner, we work one-on-one ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Vigerslev Allé 77, Copenhagen, Valby, DK, DK-2500

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fls.com
760/1000Fair

FLSmidth is a full flowsheet technology and service supplier to the global mining industry. We enable our customers to improve performance, lower operating costs and reduce environmental impact. MissionZero is our sustainability ambition towards zero emissions in mining...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13,187
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLSmidth in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FLSmidth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLSmidth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables company and FLSmidth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables or FLSmidth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables or FLSmidth ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables and FLSmidth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parker Hannifin | Power Generation & Renewables and FLSmidth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2