Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pottery BarnPottery Barn
VS
Fnac DartyFnac Darty
Pottery Barn

Pottery Barn

151 Union Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, US

Last Update: 15/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.potterybarn.com
780/1000Fair

For over 70 years, Pottery Barn has represented exceptional quality and unparalleled value. America’s most meaningful, beautiful design source, we bring together good products, people and values. We believe that style evolves, but quality is timeless. Original designs...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:3,043
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fnac Darty

Fnac Darty

ZAC PORT D IVRY 9 RUE DES BATEAUX LAVOIRS, IVRY SUR SEINE, FR, 94200

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://fnacdarty.com/
691/1000Weak

Le groupe Fnac Darty est un leader européen de la distribution omnicanale, spécialisé dans les biens culturels, les loisirs, les produits techniques, l’électroménager et les services. Avec un réseau de 1 500 magasins dans le monde et 30 000 collaborateurs passionnés, il...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:20,737
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pottery Barn

Pottery Barn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fnac Darty

Fnac Darty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pottery Barn in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Fnac Darty has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pottery Barn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pottery Barn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fnac Darty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fnac Darty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pottery Barn

Pottery Barn

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fnac Darty

Fnac Darty

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FNA1770832351

FAQ

Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pottery Barn company and Fnac Darty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pottery Barn and Fnac Darty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pottery Barn and Fnac Darty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pottery Barn or Fnac Darty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pottery Barn or Fnac Darty ?
Between Pottery Barn and Fnac Darty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pottery Barn and Fnac Darty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2