Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pots & Co LtdPots & Co Ltd
VS
Nestlé Nespresso SANestlé Nespresso SA
Pots & Co Ltd

Pots & Co Ltd

307 Elveden Road, London, undefined, NW10 7ST, GB

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.potsandco.com
761/1000Fair

Pots & Co was founded in 2012 by Julian Dyer, who wanted to take exceptional puddings out of restaurants and into homes. From our kitchen in London, we hand-make and steam-bake all our puds in their individual ceramic pots – that’s what creates their inimitable depth an...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:39
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Avenue de Rhodanie 40, Lausanne, CH, CH 1007

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nespresso.com
802/1000Good

Coffee is at the heart of everything we do, and consumer satisfaction is why we do it. Our story started with one simple idea: everyone should be able to make the perfect cup of coffee at home. Something we still believe today, which is why we think delivering the hig...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,727
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pots & Co Ltd

Pots & Co Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pots & Co Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé Nespresso SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pots & Co Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pots & Co Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nestlé Nespresso SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé Nespresso SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pots & Co Ltd

Pots & Co Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pots & Co Ltd or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pots & Co Ltd or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pots & Co Ltd and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2