Positivetechnologies vs Slbglobal - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Positive Technologies

SLB

Positive Technologies

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://global.ptsecurity.com/en/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=main&utm_content=bio&utm_term=global

752/1000Fair

Positive Technologies is a leading developer of products, solutions and services for result-driven cybersecurity that enable detection and prevention of attacks before they cause unacceptable damage to businesses and entire economic sectors. The company's technology p...

NAICS:513

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:711

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, Texas, US, 77056

Last Update: 21/07/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

https://www.slb.com

839/1000Good

SLB is a global technology company that has driven energy innovation for more than a century. With a global footprint in more than 100 countries and employees representing almost twice as many nationalities, we work each day on innovating oil and gas, delivering digital...

NAICS:513

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:81,376

Subsidiaries:2

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Positive Technologies

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

SLB

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Positive Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Positive Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Positive Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Positive Technologies

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack

POS1766629641

SLB

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Positive Technologies company and SLB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Positive Technologies and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Positive Technologies and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Positive Technologies or SLB ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Positive Technologies or SLB ?

Between Positive Technologies and SLB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Positive Technologies and SLB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES